Flyers fans vandalize reporter’s car

May 18th 2010

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/breaking/sports_breaking/94001159.html

Reporter had tough time in Philly

By Pat Hickey

THE (MONTREAL) GAZETTE

PHILADELPHIA – This is supposed to be the City of Brotherly Love, but the citizenry has strayed from the ideals espoused by its founder, William Penn.

Over the years, the city’s sports fans have earned a reputation as boorish fanatics. These are the folks who booed Santa Claus and pelted him with snowballs at an Eagles game.

“Why do people keep bringing that up?” asked John Monaghan, who was dispensing drinks Sunday night at Kelly Monaghan’s in neighbouring Essington.

Probably because some Philadelphia fans – not unlike fans in other cities, including Montreal – have never learned that there’s a fine line between supporting a team and criminal behaviour.

I was disgusted by the latest riot in Montreal following a Canadiens’ victory over Pittsburgh. While Premier Jean Charest assured us that the miscreants weren’t Canadiens’ fans, former colleague Michael Farber asked the question: “Who do they root for? Are they Penguins’ fans? Colorado fans?”

There was certainly an element which took advantage of an opportunity to do some after-hours shopping at the SAQ and Foot Locker, but I saw dozens of photographs in which the out-of-control revelers were wearing Canadiens jersey. And, while the team won’t admit, the decision not to show the first two games of the Philadelphia series on the series on the giant screen at the Bell Centre, was made with an eye toward avoiding more trouble.

There were several incidents at Game 1 of the Flyers-Canadiens series here Sunday night. I saw fans in Canadiens jerseys heckled, which is fair game. I also saw several of them being bumped around, which isn’t acceptable.

Some vandals pulled the plug on a pregame telecast by Radio-Canada and another Canadian TV crew was harassed.

I found myself the unwanted centre of attraction when I went to my car after the game. One tire was flat, the bug deflector had been ripped from the hood, a hubcap had been snapped in two and the trunk and roof of the car were littered with beer cans. The windows were covered with beer and soda.

These were minor inconveniences. I bought a new tire and took a run through a car wash. And when you have 565,000 kilometres on a 1999 Honda Accord, you don’t worry about a bug deflector.

But my biggest concern was that some yahoo tore off my license plate. I spent three hours Monday, shuttling between police stations before I was able to fill out a report on the theft. I’m hoping that the report will help me clear customs Wednesday.

The attitude of some Philly fans – I have a lot of friends in the city and made some new ones on this trip – was in stark contrast to the fans in Washington and Pittsburgh, who were gracious throughout the first two rounds of the series and far more civil than the Montreal fans who booed the U.S. anthem.

Prior to Game 1, the Flyers passed out T-shirts with the legend: Relentless in the pursuit of history.

Relentless in the pursuit of idiocy would be a better slogan for a city whose history includes abusing Santa Claus.

comments: Closed - Read comments to this post

Cheesesteak Pretzels?

May 17th 2010

Am I the only one who finds the thought of this particular concoction revolting? To each his own as far as taste for food goes but I honestly can not fathom why anyone would want a meat-filled pretzel. Then again people eat fish heads so this isn’t the worst thing ever. Still……

http://www.philly.com/philly/restaurants/93923134.html?cmpid=15585797

Cheesesteak Pretzel makes official debut today

By Peter Mucha

Inquirer Staff Writer
The marriage of two of Philadelphia’s favorite foodstuffs was celebrated today with a lunchtime giveaway at Love Park.

Meet the Cheesesteak Pretzel: a handheld cheesesteak baked inside soft-pretzel dough.

More than 700 were handed out, to mostly positive reviews.

“This stuff is good,” said Jermaine Bernard, 33, finishing his first while in line to get a second. The visitor from Los Angeles hoped to try for a third as well.

“Not two thumbs up, but one thumb up,” said actuary Derek Eyler, 25, of Abington.

“I would like maybe a little bit more cheese,” said real estate manager Mandy Davis, 27, of Center City. While a regular cheesesteak can be a meal, the Cheesesteak Pretzel, she said, was “more snack appropriate.”

“It’s kind of a strange combination,” said victim advocate Kourtney Burris, 24, of South Philadelphia. “It’s straight-up Philly, that’s what it is.”

The folks at the Philly Pretzel Factory introduced the Cheesesteak Pretzels this morning at almost every one of its more than 100 stores between New York State and Georgia.

The regular price is $3.50, or two for $6. (Get 2 for $4 with a coupon found on Page 17 of today’s Daily News.)

Next Monday, every outlet will also serve them up for free between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m.

It’s a twist on the chain’s Pretzel Dogs and Spicy Pretzel Sausages – links poking out the ends of golden-brown tubes.

The Cheesesteak Pretzel, though, is totally enclosed, like a knish.

“It’s good. . . . It’s not messy like a regular cheesesteak,” said steam mechanic Bill Toole, 45, of Woodbury, sitting in his truck outside the 16th and Sansom store this morning. “I’m not going to be wearing this all day.”

“It’s the exact taste” of a regular cheesesteak, said sanitation engineer Aaron Godwin, 18, of Swarthmore. “I like it. . . . There’s a lot of cheese in it.”

The aim was to add another lunchtime option, said Daniel DiZio, president of the chain, which sold 125 million soft pretzels last year.

A year and a half of research and testing went into the final product, which has American cheese, no onions, he said.

Fried onions were considered, and might be in a future version. The door’s open on other possibilities, though don’t expect to see a Hoagie Pretzel or salads, said DiZio, 39, who started selling pretzels on Roosevelt Boulevard at age 11.

comments: Closed - Read comments to this post

Philadelphia Bombs its own Residents

May 13th 2010

http://cbs3.com/local/move.bombing.philadelphia.2.1687315.html

Philly Neighborhood Scars Unhealed From 1985 Bomb

25-Year’s Since Philadelphia’s MOVE Bombing

PHILADELPHIA (AP) ― Gerri Bostic lost all her material possessions 25 years ago when police dropped a bomb on her block, killing five children and six adult members of the militant group MOVE and incinerating 61 row homes.

Perhaps her biggest losses were her peace of mind and sense of community.

Her West Philadelphia neighborhood—now nearly vacant and eerily quiet—never recovered from the city’s horrific botched attempt to arrest the MOVE members on May 13, 1985. The violent confrontation was a rare bombing of American citizens by civilian authorities in the United States.

Today, after spending more than $43 million on redevelopment, the city has two blocks of boarded-up eyesores to show for its efforts. The homes built to replace those lost in the bomb-ignited inferno were so shoddy that officials stopped making repairs and offered buyouts.

“There’s nothing nice about this block anymore,” said Bostic, 89. “All the people are gone.”

And now that a long-running lawsuit over the replacement houses has ended, Councilwoman Jannie Blackwell says the city needs to put the past to rest on Osage Avenue and Pine Street.

“It’s time to make peace with it all and fix up the properties,” Blackwell said.

It won’t be easy; Philadelphia has many blighted areas competing for attention. And developers of these blocks will have the added challenge of winning support from embittered residents whose American Dream of homeownership has been a nightmare.

“We’ve been victimized twice,” Osage resident Milton Williams said.

Some might say Williams and his neighbors have been victimized three times—the first being when MOVE arrived around 1981.

The revolutionary back-to-nature group came to the city’s Cobbs Creek section after a 1978 shootout with police at its previous home. One officer died in the firefight; nine MOVE members went to prison, and others moved to Osage Avenue.

They soon turned their middle-class row house into a fortified compound, with a bunker on the roof and wooden slats over the windows. Reeking garbage attracted vermin, and loudspeakers blared obscene daily rants against authorities for jailing their peers.

“You really couldn’t get any rest,” said Connie Renfrow, who still lives on Osage. “The kids couldn’t do their studies.”

Her husband, Gerald Renfrow, said neighbors at first tried to address the problems directly with MOVE members, all of whom used the surname Africa. When talking failed, residents called authorities—but to no avail.

“They just let it fester,” he said.

Police decided to move on MOVE in mid-May 1985, obtaining arrest and search warrants on the belief the group’s house contained illegal weapons and explosives. Authorities evacuated the block on May 12, telling residents there would be a police action the next day.

When they were refused entry to serve the warrants on May 13, police began an hours-long siege using water cannons, tear gas and bullets. A state police helicopter flew overhead carrying Philadelphia officers and a canvas satchel loaded with explosives.

The bomb ignited a gasoline-fueled conflagration that killed the MOVE militants and children and obliterated two blocks of homes. Ramona Africa, then 29, and Birdie Africa, then 13, escaped with major burns.

Residents, who had been told to take just a change of clothes with them, came home to find ruins.

“Nothing but brick and rubble,” recalled Gerald Renfrow, 64.

After more than a year in temporary housing, residents returned to their rebuilt homes in the fall of 1986. That winter, the roofs started leaking.

Next came discoveries of defective plumbing and wiring, bad flooring, nails popping out of walls, burst pipes, flooded basements and backyards and broken appliances. Replacement trees have since uprooted parts of the sidewalk and are strangling pipes.

Milton Williams, 61, has had five stoves, four roofs and two living room ceilings. Today, his front and back windows look out on boarded-up homes.

“It’s embarrassing to invite people over here,” he said.

After 14 years of unending repairs, then-Mayor John Street decided in 2000 that the houses were beyond salvage. He offered owners $125,000 each plus $25,000 in moving expenses; 37 people took him up on it. The homes were then worth about $75,000 each.

But 24 residents sued for breach of contract for stopping the repairs, which had been promised by Street’s predecessor. A federal jury awarded each homeowner $534,000, but a judge slashed it to $250,000. An appeal brought the settlement to $190,000 per house in 2008.

Sixteen homeowners, including Williams and Bostic, accepted the deal. Bostic, though, said it is not enough money to move off Osage and, in any case, she is too old to start over. She turns 90 in September.

“I think if I have to move it will kill me,” Bostic said. “Why couldn’t they fix the houses like they should have?”

Williams said he won’t spend any money on his house while the city-owned homes are abandoned.

“I’m not going to invest any more in this place not knowing what they’re going to do with these homes,” Williams said.

Eight homeowners—including the Renfrows—have refused to accept the settlement, saying to do so would wrongly imply the city had made things right.

The Renfrows say the money would not allow them to buy an equivalent house in an area with the amenities they have now—a park, public transportation and proximity to downtown, shopping and entertainment.

And while they’ve paid off their mortgage, they cannot tap the home’s equity. The house is valueless and unsellable, they say, as long as it needs repairs and sits amid blight.

“They promised to make us whole,” said Connie Renfrow, 63. “They haven’t even made us halfway whole.”

Blackwell, the councilwoman who represents the area, says developers have expressed interest in the lots but never followed through—in part because of the legal baggage and lack of support from the city.

Still, six months before the homeowners’ suit settled, Blackwell wrote to the new mayor’s chief of staff to say it is “long past the time that we have a plan for these properties.”

“I think we have all been fortunate that no one has broken into these homes and created another disaster,” she wrote in March 2008.

Neighbors agree. They say Osage, which once hosted huge community block parties, has become a street for illicit sex and drug deals because of the blight.

“They think that no one lives here,” Gerald Renfrow said. Blackwell repeated her warning in a letter last December to Mayor Michael Nutter, the fourth city leader to deal with fallout from the bombing. But little has been done.

Nutter spokesman Doug Oliver said in a statement that, unfortunately, the city has many blighted areas demanding attention.

“In the long run, our best hope to redevelop these neighborhoods is to continue building a vibrant city with a strong tax base that will enable us to rebuild these communities,” he said.

The MOVE survivors and victims’ relatives collectively received about $5.5 million in compensation from the city. Some MOVE members now live in a blue-and-white Victorian in the city’s Clark Park section, about two miles from Osage Avenue.

There are no slats, no roof bunker, no loudspeakers—just a few dogs.

Ramona Africa, now 54, said the group of about three dozen members continues to fight what it considers the unfair incarceration of eight members for the 1978 officer killing. A ninth died in prison.

“There is no justice in the legal system,” Africa said. “Not just for MOVE, but for anybody.”

Meanwhile, their former house on Osage was rebuilt and sits among those boarded up.

For 20 years after the bombing, it was occupied first by the city’s redevelopment authority, then by a round-the-clock police detail to ensure MOVE did not return.

Today, phone books are piled on the stoop, a decrepit sawhorse sits by the front door and the window blinds are drawn.

The police, too, have moved out.

comments: Closed - Read comments to this post

School Spying on Students

May 6th 2010

This story broke during my absence. It’s old news at this point but still deserves to be here.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/90997579.html

Lawyer: Laptops took thousands of images

By John P. Martin
INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

The system that Lower Merion school officials used to track lost and stolen laptops wound up secretly capturing thousands of images, including photographs of students in their homes, Web sites they visited, and excerpts of their online chats, says a new motion filed in a suit against the district.

More than once, the motion asserts, the camera on Robbins’ school-issued laptop took photos of Robbins as he slept in his bed. Each time, it fired the images off to network servers at the school district.

Back at district offices, the Robbins motion says, employees with access to the images marveled at the tracking software. It was like a window into “a little LMSD soap opera,” a staffer is quoted as saying in an e-mail to Carol Cafiero, the administrator running the program.

“I know, I love it,” she is quoted as having replied.

Those details, disclosed in the motion filed late Thursday in federal court by Robbins’ attorney, offer a wider glimpse into the now-disabled program that spawned Robbins’ lawsuit and has shined an international spotlight on the district.

In the filing, the Penn Valley family claims the district’s records show that the controversial tracking system captured more than 400 photos and screen images from 15-year-old Blake Robbins’ school-issued laptop during two weeks last fall, and that “thousands of webcam pictures and screen shots have been taken of numerous other students in their homes.”

Robbins, a sophomore at Harriton High School, and his parents, Michael and Holly Robbins, contend e-mails turned over to them by the district suggest Cafiero “may be a voyeur” who might have viewed some of the photos on her home computer.

The motion says Cafiero, who has been placed on paid leave, has failed to turn that computer over to the plaintiffs despite a court order to do so, and asks a judge to sanction her.

Cafiero’s lawyer Thursday night disputed the suggestion that his client had downloaded any such photos to her home computer. Lawyer Charles Mandracchia said Cafiero has cooperated with federal investigators and is willing to let technicians hired by the district examine her computer if the judge so orders.

He also said Robbins’ attorney had never asked him for Cafiero’s personal computer. “He’s making this up because his case is falling apart,” Mandracchia said.

Since the Robbinses sued in February, district officials have acknowledged that they activated the theft-tracking software on school-issued laptops 42 times since September, and a number of times in the previous school year – all in order to retrieve lost or stolen computers.

But they have stopped short of specifying how many students may have been photographed and monitored, or how often – information that could shed light on whether Robbins’ experience was unique or common.

An attorney for the district declined to comment last night on the Robbinses’ latest motion, except to say that a report due in a few weeks will spell out what the district’s own investigation has found.

“To the extent there is any evidence of misuse of any images, that also will be disclosed,” said the attorney, former federal prosecutor Henry E. Hockeimer Jr. “However, at this late stage of our investigation we are not aware of any such evidence.”

The Robbinses’ lawyer, Mark S. Haltzman, said the new details emerged in tens of thousands of pages of documents and e-mails the district turned over to him in recent weeks.

Three district employees have also given sworn depositions in the suit. A fourth, Cafiero, declined to answer Haltzman’s questions, asserting her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

According to the latest filing by the Robbinses, officials first activated the tracking software on a school-issued Apple MacBook that Robbins took home on Oct. 20.

Hundreds of times in the next two weeks, the filing says, the program did its job each time it was turned on: A tiny camera atop the laptop snapped a photo, software inside copied the laptop screen image, and a locating device recorded the Internet address – something that could help district technicians pinpoint where the machine was.

The system was designed to take a new picture every 15 minutes until it was turned off.

The material disclosed by the district contains hundreds of photos of Robbins and his family members – “including pictures of Blake partially undressed and of Blake sleeping,” the motion states.

Through Haltzman, the Robbinses last night gave The Inquirer a photo they said was among the Web cam images turned over by school officials. The picture shows Blake asleep in bed at 5 p.m. last Oct. 26, the lawyer said.

Robbins and his parents say they first learned of the technology on Nov. 11, when an assistant Harriton principal confronted the teen with an image collected by the tracking software.

Robbins has said one image showed him with a handful of Mike and Ike candies – which the administrator thought were illegal pills.

The family’s lawyers have argued that neither Blake nor many of the other students whose laptop cameras were activated had reported those laptops missing or stolen. According to the motion, an unspecified number of laptops were being tracked because students had failed to return computers or pay a required insurance fee.

The district has said it turned on the camera in Robbins’ computer because his family had not paid the $55 insurance fee and he was not authorized to take the laptop home.

U.S. District Judge Jan E. DuBois has ordered all parties in the case to meet by Tuesday, the latest step toward a settlement. Meanwhile, federal and county investigators are examining whether the laptop security program violated any laws.

Also Thursday, Sen. Arlen Specter (D., Pa.) introduced legislation to close what he said was a loophole in federal wiretap laws and prevent unauthorized monitoring. Specter recently held a hearing in Philadelphia on the issue.

“Many of us expect to be subject to certain kinds of video surveillance when we leave our homes and go out each day – at the ATM, at traffic lights, or in stores, for example,” Specter, who is running for reelection, said on the floor of the Senate. “What we do not expect is to be under visual surveillance in our homes, in our bedrooms and, most especially, we do not expect it for our children in our homes.”

comments: Closed - Read comments to this post

Driveway? So what?

May 6th 2010

The following is a reader contribution.
It demonstrates yet another instance of how so many people in Philadelphia are unable to live their lives in a way that does not cause problems for other people….

The house I live in comes complete with it’s own off street parking in the form of a driveway. Most would think that a good thing, though I feel cursed.
I am constantly having my own personal “parking wars”, as my own neighbors feel they have the right to park in it in such a manner to render that driveway totally useless to me. In other words we can’t get out.
I am a kidney patient who could need the services of the emergency room at a moments notice. My neighbors think I should have to ask their permission to get out or that I should know every car their friends own so that I can come knock at their door and have it moved.
I have had my front door kicked in and been assaulted to the point of needing and receiving a restraining order and yet they still park there.
I have had police try to intervene and yet they still park there.
I have walked the entire block knocking on doors looking for the owner of a vehicle…and spent entire weekends totally blocked in my own driveway. And that is just my home.

The parking issue with the driveway isn’t just a “drive me insane” type of deal for me anymore. This is going to end up being lethal for me.
I’ve been told “just call an ambulance” if I can’t get out of my driveway and require prompt medical attention, however, the ambulance is NOT going to take me to the ****** County Hospital where all my specialist doctors are located.
A week ago, I had to call the police about the neighbor I have the restraining order against being parked in my driveway (my very worst offender too). Can you imagine the responding officer told me to just go knock at their door and ask them to move it if I have to get out???
Now why would someone suggest having contact with someone you have a restraining order clearly stating that you are to totally avoid having contact with?? So, just what IS the purpose of acquiring a restraining order?? I walk the streets all the time wondering if it’s just me…

comments: Closed - Read comments to this post

Random Kindness

May 6th 2010

A few weeks ago something pretty bad happened to me. Sitting in my car in a parking lot, thinking about the recent turn of events, I started crying. Couldn’t help it.

A woman going to get into the car next to mine noticed. She came over and asked if there was anything she could do.

Of course there’s nothing this stranger could do to help me. But she saw a suffering person and approached me, willing to at least express concern.

Who knows, this woman could be one of those people who drives 50mph in the left lane of highways. Yet this little act of kindness to a stranger shows a caring soul.

Not everyone in Philadelphia is rotten and mean-hearted. Yes I rant about the inconsiderate behavior I encounter on a daily basis but I know there are good people here as well.

comments: Closed - Read comments to this post